Monday, 8 March 2010

Thriller Audience Research

Thriller Research - Role of Woman

For my second thriller research section I decided to host a screening for friends and family of the film "Panic Room" starring Jodie Foster. I decided on this film due to the fact it features strongly the role of two woman - Foster and her daughter - and this links in well with the use of woman in my own thriller production.

My own thriller production is a modern thriller that follows a generic mainstream thriller plotline and that features, much like panic room, a certain area that offers a lot of the action. This being the basement. For my research I decided to ask the people viewing the film a series of multiple choice questions.

These questions are as followed:

1) Does the role of woman effect how you view a film?

2) How does the character played by Jodie Foster contest with generic stereotypes?

3) Do you think mainstream films such as panic room dramatise the role of woman too much?

4) Does Jodie Foster's appearance in various thrillers such as Panic Room, Flightplan and Inside Man make draw you to her latest picture?

5) Do you think independent films push the boundaries in a far greater way than mainstream ones when it comes to the presentation of woman in film?

The Results are as follows:




1) Out of the ten people asked to view the film, eight people said that the role of a woman in a dominent roll makes them view a film differently. Most of these people said that due to it going against gender stereotyping it offers a greater element of suspense and thrill as the woman is less predicatable. Furthermore most of these people argued that a woman in a predatorial/dominent roll makes a film more engaging due to them generally being more emotional attached than a male would.

2) Most people agreed that due to Jodie Fosters character taking a dominent role over the male attackers the film was made more thrilling and exciting. The male robbers were portrayed as clumbsy and foolhardy, while foster was seen as playing the more dominating and clever role. The use of this generic stereotyping role reversal - much like the works of Tarantino's Jackie Brown - meant that the whole film was flipped into a world of unpredicatability and emotional attatchment. On the one hand we saw the cleverness of Fosters ability to stay hidden while deep down we knew at heart she was still a woman and lacked the physical strength to beat off her attackers - this could be seen strongly in the scene where she tries to retrieve her mobile phone - a suspense filled few minutes!

3) The gap between the Yes's and the No's was smaller this time, but it seemed that more people believed that the role of Foster's character had been dramatised too much. Whereas woman in films such as Jackie Brown and Physco were seen to be cunning yet ill-fated at times it seemed the role of Foster in Panic Room made her seem a rather alianted from the outside room, and often made her seem out of touch from reality. Films such as London To Brighton show woman to be devious and cunning but at the same time vulnerable, Panic Room didnt manage this kind of idea quite as well. This could be due to it being a more mainstream film.

4) It seemed that most people agreed a female actor such a Jodie Foster gains support due to her ability to produce various convincing dominent Female roles. This was as I expected, and it also seemed most people believed the characterisation of her roles goes towards making her so successful at what she does. This will be helpful when doing our own thriller as it will enable us to ensure our femmefatale fits the same kind of gender specifics that an actor like Foster does.



5) As expected most people agreed that independent films are far greater at pushing the boundaries in the way they present films. Films like London To Brighton promote woman to be far more real than mainstream films such as panic room. The scenes in London To brighton where prostitution was apparent are far less apparent in bigger budget films and even when they are shown are far less gritty. However people did agree that some films in the mainstream market do promote a breaching of gender boundaries. To go back to films like Jackie Brown and Physco we can see how some directors are willing to show their actors as very much capable of taking on a devious role or playing the predatorial character that would usualy be played by a male.

Overall the screening taught me much about peoples knowledge and understanding of the role of woman in films. Some ideas such as a strong charachter will help me in ensuring the Femmefatale in our film has a strong, powerful attitude about her. Whereas other revelations such as the mainstream / independent divide allowed me to see how farbehind most mainstream directors are in promoting so called taboo ideologies such as prostitution.

Sunday, 21 February 2010

Costume

Thriller Film Costume

Due to the fact our thriller film is set during a modern environment we wanted to ensure our costume fit in with this time period. Therefore the costume of the assistant and the shop owner can be seen as being casual and modern while fitting in with the working environment.

The femmefatale however, who visits the shop to steal the money and who consequently murders the shop assistant we wanted to stand out from the rest of the cast yet keep her devious appeal. For this we dressed "Grace Jones" the femmefatale in black, while giving her noticeable bright coloured elements to ensure she stood out. For example we used red nail varnish to add a seductive and bold statement and used pink high heels to suggest she was trying to be innocent on the outside.

Youth In Revolt

"Youth in Revolt"
Director - Miguel Arteta


Those who are fimiliar with films such as "Superbad" and "Juno" will know of comic actor and performer Michael Cera. "Youth in Revolt" much like "Superbad" saw Cera playing a down and out teenager who lacked.. well any social ability.


The film begins with Nick Twsip (Michael Cera) living with his recently divorced mother and new boyfriend Jerry - (Played by "The Hangover" star Zach Galifianakis), Nick has to not only put up with Jerry, but his inability to interact with girls, his eccentric next door neighbour and his general life as a whole.

To cut a long story short, Nick ends up having to move to a trailer park where suddenly his life changes thanks to meeting the "love of his life" (Sheeni Saunders) but ofcourse things couldnt be as simple as falling in love. Oh no.. To get Sheeni Nick will have to prove to her he is the man she needs.


To do this Nick decides he must create an alter ego namingly Francois Dillinger. What results is a confusing role reversal where Nick suddenly finds himself destroying Cafe's, being chased by the police and breaking as many laws as he can.

"Youth in Revolt" is a film that does exactly what it says on the tin. Its a film about teenage life taken to the extreme mixed with the comic genious that is expected from an actor such as Michael Cera. The film may not be the greatest teen comedy of all time, but "Youth in Revolt" offers its audience a great laugh and a decent enough storyline at the same time.


IMDB Rating: 7.1 / 10

The Hurt Locker

"The Hurt Locker"
Director - Kathryn Bigelow

With filming almost over, I decided to create a new section of the blog where I review/analyse various films I have recently watched.

To kick things off I decided to finally go out and buy a film that seemed to spring up from nowhere and which recieved fantastic reviews across the board, while also propelling its leading actor to a "Best Actor" nomination at the Oscars.


Before watching "The Hurt Locker" I wasn't to sure what to expect. On the one hand I couldnt help feel it would be a pro-america, pro-war film aimed at supporting the troops out in the middle east, on the other hand through the trailers and clips I had viewed it seemed to resemble much that the 2007 film "The Kingdom" starring Jamie Foxx had offered. How wrong I was.

By the opening few chapters it had been established this was neither a pro-war film nor a glamorous take on the life of the average soldier. This was a gritty ,thought provoking drama about the current state of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. A film that told its audience war is unpredicatable, hateful and full of suprise.

The films itself was shot in a way that suggested you the viewer were viewing the action through the eyes of one of the american troopers. Ever vigilant for enemy activity the camera would often zoom to various locations along the deserted city to suggest the feeling of being watched. This was superb at building tension and suspense especially during the scenes that put the american soldiers out in the open.

The characterisation of the american G.I's was also superb, Jeremy Renner's performance as the socially isolated and emotially detatched bomb disposer was brilliant and well worth an oscar recognition, while the supporting cast were also great at presenting the constant feeling of suspense and tension. The conflcition between Renner and his squad mates built upon this idea of emotional detatchment and gave something extra to the whole film experience.

To sum up, "The Hurt Locker" offers the viewer a brilliant piece of modern war realism while also offering action lovers a film that doesnt dissapoint graphically. The cast of the film deserve massive congratulation for their performances as emotionaly stable yet constantly uneasy soldiers, and whereas other films of the war genre seem to go about a film all guns blazing, "The Hurt Locker" offered a superb tension thriller with brilliant action and storyline.

IMDB Rating: 8.0 / 10

The BAFTA Awards 2010

The BAFTA Awards 2010


Tonight marks the 63rd annual BAFTA ceremony, a night where hollywood meets indepedent film. The BAFTA's offer those who work for independent film the chance to stand up and be heared. With catogories such as "Best Short Film" and "Best British Debut for a Director/Writer/Producer" the BAFTA's are a great ceremony for celebrating those who very much deserve recognition for significent independent film achievements, who may otherwise not be heared over the mainstream media hype!"


The BAFTA's also cater for many of the greatest mainstream films to come out over the last year. Films such as "Inglorious Basterds", "Avatar" and "The Hurt Locker" are all up for various awards, with "Christoph Waltz" up for a well deserved best supporting actor award for his genious performace as Col. Hans Landa in "Inglorious Basterds."


The BAFTA's this year presented by Johnathon Ross will offer a great insight into those who stand a decent chance at being awarded arguably films greatest award. The Oscar. While also celebrating all those independent actors and directors who also create such powerful films sometimes overshadowed by the mainstream world of film.

Monday, 25 January 2010

Key Media Definitions

Femmefatale - A devious women of great seductive charm who leads men into compromising and dangerous situations. (An alluring or mysterious women)

Sunday, 24 January 2010

Film Technology Essay

The Evolution and Advancement of Film Technology Due To Audience Demand


The film industry will always need to adapt to meet the demands of the paying customer. From the introduction of technicolour in 1932, to this year’s blockbuster Avatar’s revival of the 3D film. Technology will always play an important role in the film industry. But is all this technology eating away at good old fashion film production? And are the technological advancements required by the audience turning plot driven epics into CGI packed flops?

Back in 1915 the first movies (as we know them) began to be shown, movies that did not yet have their own sound, these so-called silent films were the wonder and amazement of millions. Recognisable figureheads such as Charlie Chaplin charmed and thrilled audiences as the age of slapstick comedy was at its peak. Critics however argued the early years of the 3D movie presented a “dumbing down” of film production and argue it was not till “The Jazz Singer” (1927) and the introduction of sound in films that the age of the film industry began to take off.



By the early 1930’s the introduction of “Technicolor” allowed films to be shown in a basic arrange of colours and so begins the discussion of our first technological advancement:”Technicolor”. The use of “Technicolor” in films, for many brought the image on the screen to life. Although indeed many films before this new technology had been released were shown in a basic colour, “Technicolor” was much clearer and was much more easily used. Films such as Disney’s “Flower and Trees” (1932) and “Three Little pigs” were massive successes with both the paying public and sceptical Critics. By now audiences and film makers alike were beginning to realise the endless possibilities of film making and the demand for technology was beginning to fasten its pace.



Over the next thirty years film making continued to evolve and prosper. With “Black and White” films arguably still holding superiority. Actors such as “John Wayne” and “Humphrey Bogart” took on leading roles as Hollywood heartthrobs helping the people of Europe and the US progress through the Second World War. The people of a war torn world needed heroes and such actors offered it to them in bundles, the film industry supplied much needed moral boosting entertainment and in the mean time film technology continued to develop. The constant demand of new technology and film continued to exist throughout the 50’s and 60’s, the audiences need for colour film began to out – weigh that of the old “black and white” and by the late 60’s it seemed certain that “black and white” film had had its day. By the 1970’s the development of the animated wire frame graphic, saw cult classic Star Wars (1977) rise to fame and fortune. As audience demand seemed to require a never ending supply of advancement the older “black and white” classics began to turn into just that, classics. With a supply of another two Star Wars epics and various other groundbreaking productions other the next century a new age had begun for film making.



By the 1990’s due to a change in culture and technology the age of film making began to advance once again. This time the advancement would be through animation. Arguably the most famous name in film making, Disney was back at the forefront of technological change. “Toy Story” showed the world the first glimpse of CGI animation as we know it today. A piece of technology that would entertain audiences of all ages the birth of CGI entertainment offered a completely new source of enjoyment and would please greatly all those who craved for further advancements in the world of the film industry. Lead by “Woody” (Tom Hanks) and “Buzz” (Tim Allen) little did the toys of one fortunate child know. That they would be the founding fathers of the multimillion earner, that is the world of CGI animation.



In just over 50 years the film industry had advanced from basic “black and white” silent films to advanced CGI animations that sold for millions of dollars. However the hunger of the audience continued to grow and the need for further advancements in film making was required, over the next decade CGI would take a forefront in the world of films. “Star Wars” would return for another three films bringing with it extreme usage of CGI, alienating it from some of its diehard fans due to its arguable lack of enthusiasm and plot. Comic fan’s favourite “Marvel” would also join the CGI race converting many of its 2D heroes and villains into multimillion selling film icons such as “Ironman” and “The Hulk.” It seemed for some time film technology had finally met the demand of its eager audiences. The idea of a totally 3D film lingered for some time but nothing of any substance seemed to come about. That was however till the 18th of December 2009 where a film named Avatar would push the boundaries even further.




“Avatar” directed and written by James Cameron would be a film that took the jump into a technology argued by some critics to be a dead end. However what it would achieve would amaze its audiences and surprise even the most sceptical of critics. “Avatar” used the most modern 3D technology and CGI to bring the film straight to its viewer. Much like “Toy Story”, “The Jazz Singer” and “The Flowers and the Trees,” “Avatar” was the first film of its kind and was a bridge over to a world of new possibilities. Some critics still argued that the technology was unnecessary but generally the reception not to mention the billions of dollars of profit tell us the general public and critics alike have been sucked into a new technological advancement and that Avatar is very much the founder of the new genre that is 3D filmmaking.



Over the journey of around 100 years the film industry has advanced by a huge magnitude. From a once silent, colourless source of enjoyment we are now at an age of technology that allows us to interact with the image on the screen. I believe the advancement has been so quick due to the heavy demand of evolution craved for by the audience. An audience will always seek more from a film, and although arguably the creation of CGI and animation have damaged the once innocent profession of film making, we are now in a time that allows us to bring the most bizarre and extraordinary ideas to life. Avatar is the current “next gen” process but in a few years no doubt we will be hit with yet more technological madness, and after all film making needs to advance to stop it being boring and outdated.